Category Archives: Design

91st Season for the Art Directors Club Awards

On May 8, the Art Directors Club (ADC) will celebrate this year’s winners during Creative Week in New York. The ADC has already released some of the award winners’ names and campaigns. I’ve highlighted a few below.

Typically, advertising or design agencies take away the coveted gold cubes, but this year Creative Artists Agency out of Los Angeles ran away with four golds and two silvers for its “Back to the Start” campaign for Chipotle. The agency’s incredibly minimalist website prevented me from learning more about it, but I gather that it is a talent agency that also offers creative services (and connections to a heck of an animation team!):

I was so happy to see one of my favorite spots from last year be awarded three golds and one silver. “The Bear,” an ad for CANAL+ (the HBO of France, I gather), is just flat-out brilliant. Kudos to mega-giant BETC Euro RSCG for still being able to crank out good work.

On May 9, the ads will be available for viewing by the public in NYC. I hope to swing by and check some out. Hope to see you there!

Author: Eric Swenson

Photo-whoops! The Joys of Photoshop Mishaps

Being a creative is tough. Art directors and designers alike have so much to contend with: copy, logos, budget constraints, time constraints, creative director input, account management input, CLIENT input––oh, and the biggest nagger of all, the critic with the harshest and most ruthless taste: themselves.

So it’s no surprise that with all this pressure, mistakes are bound to happen. I get it, art directors––it’s a lot. I’m an account guy with a big, bleeding heart who feels your pain—well, unless you muck my ish up. That is unacceptable.

The rest of the world is going to laugh at your mistakes. I’m sorry, unfortunately that’s just the life you’ve chosen. You’re in the public eye and your mistakes get seen by millions.

And now there’s a forum to see even more. I’d like to point you to a website that is doing its best to find your final art flaws: www.psdisasters.com, a collection of Photoshop mistakes made in years past and available for years to come.

Be sure to check out the Greatest Hits section and see brilliance like this:

Adweek has even gotten in on the fun. The headline from last week’s page read: “Ad in Target Circular Either Photoshopped or Features an Alien.” Love it.

Okay, okay, so there’s plenty to laugh at. Again, I recognize that you sometimes only have 25 minutes to whip something together. That being said, I leave you with a site from people who clearly have 25 minutes to spare:

www.onetinyhand.com

If you like the images below, you’ll definitely love this site. Check it out!

Author: Eric Swenson

Communication Arts’ 17th Annual Interactive Annual Awards

Communication Arts’ interactive annual winners were selected in this month’s 17th edition of the competition. This year’s panel of jurors spent 10 weeks sifting through and discerning the best 35 projects to be showcased—a job I do not envy.

The projects were divided into five categories: Advertising, Information Design, Entertainment, Self-Promotion and Experimental.

There are some really amazing projects that are worth checking out. Visit the site here for more.

A few picks:

Experimental

Per Communication Arts: “Overview: When Forever 21 claimed the iconic Virgin Record store in Times Square as its new flagship location, its goal was to stop the 500,000 daily passersby dead in their tracks. The result is a digital display that’s the center of attention on pop culture’s biggest stage. The billboard is broken into multiple LED surfaces at the heart of which is a high-definition main display that features a rotating schedule of content and models that interact over a live video feed of pedestrians. A companion Web site served as a means to connect the Forever 21 community. The online hub allowed users to see the billboard live, real-time tweets and fashion/culture tips that match the brand’s youthful, fast-moving image.”

Advertising

Per Communication Arts: “Overview: During the holiday season, consumers are jaded by the glut of shallow and meaningless marketing tactics from corporations. Starbucks stood out from the clutter with this multimedia campaign that raised awareness and donations for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS in Africa. On December 7, 2009, musicians in 156 countries sang All You Need Is Loveat exactly the same time. The performances were streamed onto screens at an event and broadcast live at StarbucksLoveProject.com and a video featuring all the performances was posted on YouTube. The entire Internet audience was encouraged to get involved in multiple visitor-participation options, each resulting in a donation from Starbucks, including participating in the worldwide sing-along and contributing to a crowdsourced tapestry of Love Drawings.”

Entertainment

Per Communication Arts: “Overview: LEGO Photo, available free at the iTunes App Store, was a component of the 2010 LEGO Cl!ck campaign and the first official iPhone application for LEGO. The app works with saved images on the iPhone and iPod touch and lets consumers immortalize their favorite images in LEGO form. Users can simply choose a photo from an existing gallery or point the camera to snap a photo then touch the screen to watch their masterpiece build. Additional screen taps show each portrait in nine different color palettes. And, celebrating the portraits is easy; users can upload them to social networking pages, e-mail or print them and tweet them using #legoclick.”

Author: Eric Swenson

Only Read This If You’re Really Creative

I’ve casually commented to close friends how the best ideas I’ve ever had have come when I’m in the bathroom. They’ve come in the form of creative solutions, conflict resolutions, or sometimes just better ways to be more efficient at a particular task. Yes, I owe a lot to my small bladder.

For years now, people have pondered over the creative geniuses of the world and asked where good ideas come from. What is it about these special people that gives them this ability? In Jonah Lehrer’s new book Imagine: How Creativity Works, as described by an article in The Economist, he argues that creativity lies in the potential nature of everyone. That, in fact, creativity is not a lofty gift held by a few. Instead, those who have a strong sense of the problem, those fully vested in the situation, will have the best possibility of finding a creative solution. (I’d argue that it also helps to spend a lot of time in the bathroom.)

Creativity comes to us in a variety of ways. The key seems to be the “freshness factor.” The freshness factor, a term I invented while clipping my fingernails, suggests that the best ideas come to us when we approach a problem from any perspective that is not current, relative, or the norm.

Lehrer supports this idea by talking about a company that is generating ideas and creating new products all the time: 3M. 3M, like Google, has a reputation for being progressive in the way it thinks about thinking. It has become the third-most innovative company in the world simply because of the emphasis it puts on employees taking time away from a problem. Those who work for 3M are often found wandering around and playing games. “This is because interrupting work with a relaxing activity lets the mind turn inward, where it can subconsciously puzzle over subtle meanings and connections,” writes The Economist reviewer. Believe it or not, our brains work quite hard when we daydream—an idea that seems counterintuitive.

CBS’s The Big Bang Theory was just pronounced the No. 1 show in syndication among viewers under 50, and because of this, TBS has become the No. 1 cable network with an average of 3 million viewers per BBT episode. The show is notorious for using real-life theoretical physics despite the average viewer understanding less than 5% of the math. In one episode, the character Sheldon is stuck on a physics problem. He decides that, rather than continue to unsuccessfully focus all his energies on the problem, he will instead do mundane activities. After a brief stint busing at The Cheesecake Factory, he discovers the answer he was looking for.

Not only do we find creativity by stepping away and redirecting our focus, but we also find it when we bring in outside minds and take risks. In marketing, it’s often the person who has no inside attachment to a project that we should rely on for that objective perspective. True, he or she may not have a sense of the client’s desires, but that outsider’s view may bring forth the unconventional idea that could lead to a better way of solving the problem.

If you work in advertising, a simple way of accomplishing this is by rotating your designers. So often we think it makes the most sense to have a designer or writer work with the same brand. Intuitively it makes sense—have the person who knows the brand the best work on the project. The reality is that people get drained. Ideas become stale. 3M requires its engineers to rotate constantly from department to department. This is also why companies who hire young, innovative thinkers tend to be ahead of the curve in terms of productivity and ideas. The naïveté of younger generations “comes with creative advantages,” Mr. Lehrer writes––experience and custom can get in the way of ideas.

You’ve probably noticed, or been a part of, large groups of friends who have a killer dynamic but often have little in common. In Imagine, Lehrer also talks about how bringing in varying perspectives, be they cultural or ethnic, can enhance an idea. It’s important, however, to recognize that group brainstorming sessions are actually a poor way of coming up with ideas. In its most effective form, brainstorming should involve separating and then coming together again to discuss ideas. The dynamic of the group will certainly play a large part when the group reforms.

I came across a great quote in my research for this post. William James wrote, “Genius, in truth, means little more than the faculty of perceiving in an unhabitual way.” Simply put, constantly challenge yourself to approach situations without a preconceived notion of what to do next. Just because it’s been done one way for years past, doesn’t mean a better way doesn’t exist.

So. Maybe we all have the ability to come up with that one, great, big idea. Maybe creativity is nothing more than finding an answer in a way that incorporates a freshness factor. Genius, it seems, can be had by all. As for me, I’ll be puzzling my own genius in a private space; I think you know the one I mean.

Author: Eric Swenson

AdForum’s Top 5 Commercials for This Week

Check out AdForum’s top five commercials for this week. We at Utterly Orange were really torn between a few of these. The fantastical, surreal nature of ACW Grey’s “Speed” campaign for Pelephone is just gorgeous—an Art Director’s dream (a literal pun indeed).

Hulu’s ad was fun, particularly since I always have a soft spot for Arrested Development’s Will Arnett. But I think this week’s winner is Ecotricity’s “Collapsing Cooling Towers,” created by Man + Hatchet.

This spot is simply a pleasure to watch. Using real footage of the destruction of nuclear and coal cooling towers, we see a straightforward CG overlay of animated faces, almost comical to watch. The music behind it really adds a level of pathos that pulls at our heartstrings on behalf of an important issue. It’s a spot that’s hard to forget—and with nearly 2.5 million views, you can see the impact it has had.

1. Pelephone – “Speed” – ACW Grey

2. Hornbach – “Festival” – HEIMAT Berlin


3. Ecotricity – “Collapsing Cooling Towers” – Man + Hatchet



4. MiO Energy – “Cheetah” – TAXI, New York

 

5. Hulu – “So Much Watching to Watch” – Crispin Porter + Bogusky


Author: Eric Swenson

Competition in Design: Wise or Waste?

There are many professions that promote competition. Design, in particular, lends itself to one-upping that coworker, the competition, and sometimes the jurors of an awards competition. Unlike art, design in advertising can sometimes be measured by the return on investment. Well-designed campaigns can be judged by sales figures.

Of course, it’s not always so black and white. There are herds of beautiful designs that get produced but never make the front page. There are strong strategic ideas that work perfectly for the client but—for one reason or another—don’t effectively catch fire. Blame the medium or blame media—ideas sometimes just don’t get fertilized. Conceiving an idea, it seems, takes just the right formula.

But there’s an even bigger hurdle to hurdle. Ask designers or copywriters at any agency in the world what their best ideas were, and they’ll give you their answers. Ask them if their best ideas were ever published, and I’m certain you’ll receive a resounding “No” in response.

In our industry, the best ideas don’t always win over our audience: the client. And that’s fine. The ideas that make it to the coveted awards competitions have to be ideas that have been produced. That means that the breadth of work we see is far narrower than what’s been attempted.

So is all this competition worth it? Is it worthwhile for companies to put in the added effort, costs, and resources to submit their ideas? Is it worth the long hours, the nail biting, and the limited publicity for the results?

Absolutely.

Andrew Carnegie once said, “And while the law [of competition] may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, because it ensures the survival of the fittest in every department.”

Love or loathe competition, it’s what drives us forward as artists (dare I say humanity?). Whether it’s friendly competition among colleagues or a battle against yourself, our need to move forward with bigger and better ideas is what helps us evolve—producing work that’s relevant and effective.

An informal survey of six nearby designers about competition showed a fun split between men and women. The women designers seemed to feel that collaboration is always the key to producing better work. The men felt that working in isolation and then exchanging ideas later was better. Both groups agreed that a spirited awards competition against other agencies would be a great way to unify ideas and kick some competitor ass.

What it would really do, however, is give designers more of a stake in our projects. Competition promotes creativity of the purest and highest order. It pushes our spirit further. It makes our ideas soar higher. Art is the essence of our humanity.

If that’s a little too grandiose for you, be sure to check out my last post on annual reports. I guess what I’m saying is, forget return on investment for a second and think about what we’re doing here.

What do you think? Competition in design—wise or waste?

Author: Eric Swenson

The Solar Annual Report: Innovative Design

Working in marketing has its highs and lows. For years I used to revel in the experiences I had at different agencies: Beer Fridays, jeans to work five days a week, Thirsty Thursdays, themed parties, Margarita Mondays, and so on. While we had a good time—and apparently had to de-stress ourselves often—it wasn’t always fun and games. Eventually reality arrived, crashing our party.

Which brings me to my next point: Don’t annual reports just flat-out suck? As hard as I try, I can’t seem to find one endearing thing about them. That is, until now.

German-based ad agency Serviceplan came up with an innovative way to produce a client’s annual report. Austria Solar, a company primarily focused on, you guessed it, thermal solar systems and companies, worked with Serviceplan to create an ingenious annual report that uses the sun’s energy to reveal its content.

The text is printed using special phosphorescent inks that only appear when they have direct or near-direct contact with light. It’s a clever little way to connect the big-picture idea to the physical execution. Check out this video that shows some of the work:

And who says annual reports can’t be fun?

Author: Eric Swenson

Social Media Explained

Eating donuts never seemed so complicated.

Source: Douglas Ray via Instagram (douglaswray).

Creating a Public Persona of My Personality for Personal Branding Purposes

I started my second personal blog the other day. I won’t shamelessly promote it here, but my friends have been inundated with requests for support. I received an interesting response from my good buddy Joe. After reading a few posts he wrote to me, “Impressed how easily you put yourself out there to the masses. I find it easy to present a character for audiences, but feel less comfortable broadcasting myself. Brave.”

Although brief, I was taken aback by his commentary. Was I really wearing my heart and soul on the sleeve of this blog? Was I laying it all out there for the world to see? Surely I wouldn’t be so stupid as to be one of those people who just say whatever comes to their minds, right? You know the type. The blogger who thinks the world gives a damn about the mundanity of his or her life: “Today I bought shoes and already I have blisters. Wait, hold on a second, need some water. Okay, I’m back. Anyway.” Or someone who shares inappropriate confessions, driven by insecurities and the need for drama: “My boyfriend isn’t romantic and often looks around the room when we kiss.”

Is this who I’ve become but in a less exaggerated sort of way? The answer, I’ve come to discover, is maybe. If some of the things I write about come from a place of truth, then maybe I really am broadcasting myself to the world. The thing is, it doesn’t feel like that. For years now I’ve considered these public displays of personality to be fiction.

I’m talking about personal branding. I’m talking about the line, which has become incredibly blurred, between who we are and who we pretend or act like when we participate online, particularly in social media. When I think about the message I put out there for the world to view, I wonder if it’s really me. And again, the answer is maybe.

Personal branding is not a new topic. In fact, it’s become our way of life. Today, people can obtain or lose jobs based simply on the way they brand themselves online. What I wonder is, are we even aware we’re doing it anymore?

I’m reminded of my Facebook page from 2005 (Ah, the gloriously elitist days when you needed a .edu to get in). The page allowed you to fill in fields about your personality: favorite songs, books, movies, etc. They still exist today, but they’re certainly not as exposed and important as they were back then. I remember all the clever things I’d post: Favorite artist—post-mortem Tupac; Favorite activity—avoiding death; Interests—onesies; Favorite quote—“Sometimes I question your dedication to Sparkle Motion.”

It became a persona—a way for me to make fun while having fun. It was also the loss of my creating-a-personal-brand virginity (and just as experimental). It was me choosing to show the world, “Hey, I want you to think I’m funny!” And this has carried on for years. We all do it. Every time we post a Facebook status update or send out a tweet, we’re communicating something about ourselves. We’re making a choice, cognizant or not, about who we are or who we want people to think we are.

Larry Kimmel of the Direct Marketing Association recently said to our company, “Kids today begin branding themselves at the age of 16.” In fact, he’s right. The millennials today learn very early on how to portray themselves in social media. I think it’s going to become harder and harder for future generations to recognize the difference between this online community and the community of our neighbors.

Thanks to my pal Joe’s insightful observation, it made me realize that maybe we’ve all gotten a little too comfortable with our pen names. We ought to step back and think about the content we’re putting out there for the world to see. Whether it’s for privacy concerns or some other reason, unintended vulnerabilities could come back to hurt us. And if I get hurt, you may end up reading about it in my blog.

Author: Eric Swenson

AdForum’s Top 5 Commercials for This Week

Check out AdForum’s top five commercials for this week. Judging from these picks, it seems agencies are feeling the funny in all their special areas. All five ads have a dollop or more of humor to them—making this week’s Utterly Orange selection all that more challenging. Even the typically not-so-exciting Cheetos spot has a funnier-than-usual feel to it.

The ad by BMF Sydney, “Delivery Girls,” gets mad credit for a great tagline: Not as sweet as you think. It reminds me of the Mike’s Hard Lemonade campaign that tries to imply Mike’s is not just a girly, sweet drink.

I also loved the Wheat Thins ad whose script, when listened to carefully, is just the words Wheat Thins over and over again. Brilliant copywriting? Just maybe.

All that being said, the clear winner here is mcgarrybowen and its campaign for Crystal Light. Mcgarrybowen has been the agency to watch these past few years, winning awards (and accounts!) left and right. In the past 365 days or so, it has taken on Advil, United Airlines, and Reebok. And those are just the accounts I’m aware of. The Crystal Light ad is funny with a dash of clever. Although it appeals to women primarily (I assume part of the brief), it’s still funny to all. It’s no wonder mcgarrybowen has been so successful these days. You can’t fake great advertising.

Feel different? Cast your vote!

1. Cheetos – “Party” – Goodby, Silverstein & Partners

2. Crystal Light – “Beach” – mcgarrybowen

3. LG – “Cheerleader” – DOJO

4. Toohey’s – “Delivery Girls” – BMF Sydney

5. Wheat Thins – “WHheat Thins” – BEING

Author: Eric Swenson