Tag Archives: Internet

Tablets, E-Readers, and iPhones Take Over the World!

Your content MUST be mobile-optimized or appified. A Pew Internet Research survey and Apple Q1 sales announcement paint a picture of a tablet, e-reader, and iPhone future filled with innovation, pain, or frustration––depending on how you proceed TODAY.

The numbers don’t lie––they suggest a trend and market preference for consumption. The tech world did not see the same game-changing flock of users adopt netbooks, and now this subcategory of laptop computers is essentially dead. The Kindles and iPads of the world have carved out a tablet niche for themselves because their form factor and technology allow for ideal consumption of much of the content available on the Internet. Get on board! Let’s clear up one small point––sorry to be a little nitpicky here, but the difference between an e-reader and a tablet is important. The title of the latest Pew report, “Tablet and E-book reader Ownership Nearly Double Over the Holiday Gift-Giving Period,” makes clear that there is a difference. “Tablet” and “E-book reader” are two distinct devices: a tablet is an e-reader with additional features, whereas an e-reader is primarily for reading content only, with fewer of the app- and Internet access-driven functions found on tablets.

By the way, in case you missed the news, Apple sold 37,000,000 iPhones in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. That is thirty-seven with six zeros. That is approximately 4.6 iPhones per New Yorker, but the thought of that many devices on the network in NYC is terrifying. One more time, iPhone sales accounted for 53% of Apple’s revenue for that quarter. Hello, iPhone––welcome to control of Apple sales and eventually everything. Fine, a little hyperbolic, but realize this: sales of iPhones mean users experiencing iOS. That experience will drive device use and preference in the future.

If your company’s primary offering can be consumed, purchased, or used online, make sure it is consumable via mobile device (tablet and smartphone) and offers an amazing user experience. Adequate, everyday, functional use of content on a mobile device will not differentiate your product in the marketplace.

If your company’s primary offering can be consumed via an app on iOS, for example, make it happen and spread the news as much as possible. Face it, the users who are buying iPhones, tablets, and e-readers now are not the early adopters––they are closer to the end of the early majority at this point. These are the users who can swing the adoption of the technology and push innovation in all aspects of the field further than we can even imagine at this point.

Courtesy of Wikipedia.

So are you ready for a mobile, smartphone/tablet-driven world? Is your content ready?

Author: John Carew

One small byte for the net, one giant leap for America with the help of a legislative choke hold!

Internets?

Last week Utterly Orange commented on how natural disasters and use of social media to distribute information can have mixed results, but we have to remember that there is still a significant portion of the population that has little or no access to the internet. With the census data released earlier this week on the nation’s poverty rates, nearly 1 in 6 Americans live in poverty. How does access to the internet stack up in their list of priorities? We know the internet is the backbone through which carries the “nerve impulses” and provide structural support for the modern commerce and communication world which we live.  As long as portions of the population continue to have limited or no access to the internet, the fragmentation between consumption and distribution channels will continue to grow.

Over the history of mass communication, new technologies always require an entrance fee, as is the case given the capitalistic economy which we live. Once radio became widespread, people had to buy receivers and the same was true with television and telephone. Eventually the components for all became so cheap that cheap “low functioning” versions of the radio, television and phone can be found in all sorts of common items.

Every step we take toward a more wired world means our dependency on these technologies continues, but for the third time in the history of mass communication we have toll collectors who don’t want to play fairly. Whether they throttle data pipes or have regional monopolies on high speed service, the companies who provide internet service to many areas of the US have the deck stacked in their favor.

Case in point with the recent announcement by Comcast to offer $10 internet and $150 laptop coupon to those who qualify for the program aimed largely at those with low income levels. Don’t get all warm and fuzzy just yet, this deal only comes as a stipulation from the Comcast and NBC Universal merger so intentions may not be as clear and friendly as the press makes the gesture out to be.

Companies claim that they are reluctant to enter the social and digital arenas since those channels may not reach their target audience. That sentiment cannot be argued with and the Comcast deal will lessen he divide, but as the market gets more competitive (and less competitive at the same time with upcoming T-Mobile/AT&T deal) consumers options become harder. We need wide spread adoption of internet and availability to all in order to expand the penetration and adoption of online services which can provide incredible services to the full gamut of users. As marketers, technologists and citizens, remember that while profits are often the goal, we must remember to focus on providing services and methods of consumption which can increase the availability of the internet in the homes of every person in this country which will ultimately give us more data and a superior conduit to each person.

Author: John Carew
Photo Credit: Jeremy Noble “UBERCULTURE

Social Media + Web + Smartphones = No More Analog Systems

A decade ago, supporters and pundits predicted the end of analog ways, classifieds, bulletin boards, and libraries. It wasn’t until the explosion of social networks and the expansion of smartphones/tablets, however, that the digital services that replaced the analog processes had the momentum to take off exponentially. Now, smartphones and social networks, in conjunction with trusted gatekeepers, are spinning the threads of social connection that were once made through local social groups.

Check out this list below, which includes both start-up and established online entities that have built digital pathways for analog problems. If you have additional suggestions, post a comment and we will expand the list.

Books PaperBack Swap
Classifieds/Goods Exchange Claz Hand Things Down

Krrb

NeighborGoods

Zaarly

Disaster Relief Housing Sparkrelief
Platform for Reporting Local Issues SeeClickFix

The grandparents and great-grandparents of the current generations lived in a time without mass transit, without telephones, and without worldwide networks. Social groups were small and heavily rooted to geography. Technological and logistical breakthroughs like the United States Post Office (now the USPS) parcel post service, railroads, the combustion engine, refrigeration, radio, telephones, and television connected ideas, services, and goods with people from afar. Before those breakthroughs, local social networks centered on societal kingpins, the social butterflies of a group who acted like the router and switch between not only conversation but the ability to fulfill needs within social circles.

For better or worse, today’s gatekeepers are the “admin” and moderators of trusted online sites and communities. Often, an organization’s legal team develops terms and conditions that govern the operation of the body, and then a team (paid or unpaid) manages the operation of the sites. Others are even more laissez-faire and use a self-policing model where users report issues to system administrators and moderators to correct. These websites have replaced the classified ads and the grocery store bulletin board and are infinitely more useful because they are more timely, targeted, searchable, sharable, and integrated.

The major benefit of analog networks was that the user’s anonymity was protected much farther down the line than with today’s digital variations. A user could traditionally wait until literally the moment before completing a transaction before exposing his or her identity (assuming that no one involved in the process knew his or her face). Anyone could anonymously tear the contact information off the bulletin board, jot down the information for an event, or browse the shelves of a bookstore without leaving a trace. Today, the entities that have built pathways to connect users to their needs put up tollbooths to collect information on those who want what is on the other side. Sometimes the data is used to safeguard the community from the likes of criminals and those who detract from the conversation. The amount of data that users must give up varies from site to site, but the burden of protecting this data falls to the builders of the pathway. The financial and healthcare industries have been saddled with this data security issue for the full length of their tenure on the Internet, with every possible transaction requiring a high level of data security to protect both the organization and the end user. Much of the security in both industries is tied to professional standards or government legislation, further placing data security as the focal point of operations for any financial or healthcare organization.

So what about all these new online organizations and the data that users are providing in order to gain access to the pathways and communities that they have built? The same level of attention needs to be paid to any information a user gives to any sort of online community or entity for no other reason than trust. An online hack or security breach, whatever the size, undermines the fundamental trust of users in an entity, ultimately eroding the very community they built.

Whether user or pathway builder, both must remember to be vigilant about data security and support the community with whatever means possible. Recent news of organized online “hacktavist” groups and their high-profile targets are the digital protests of today, comparable to the nonviolent protests and sit-ins of the civil rights and anti-war movements of the middle part of the last century. These online communities and tools––the replacements for the analog bulletin board distribution systems––are the future. The rate of adoption is yet to be determined, but they will become more and more mainstream as the user base increases. Sites will come and go, with brands starting and ending as the economy and market shift, but look at eBay, Amazon, and Craigslist. Founded in 1995, 1994, and 1995 respectively, each has defined a transactional service in three distinct areas––and has seen the subsequent rise of competitive online services––but each is still a strong entity in its particular segment. Entrepreneurs are taking risks with new ventures to provide digital solutions to analog processes. Wait until the next wave of start-ups carves out niches in the interwebs and replaces existing analog needs. The world we live in, the Internet-connected world, can be as global or as local as you choose––you just have to change the search radius.

How will you leverage trust (and innovation) in the communities that you build around your brand, service, or product?

Author: John Carew

Sir, please don’t throttle me! (Or else I’ll raise Internet Armageddon on your sorry existence!)

Netflix has changed its rate plans, and Sprint is hinting at testing bandwidth-capping through its Virgin Mobile brand. While these moves may not seem that severe, one has to ask, what is the world coming to? What is behind these decisions? Poorly structured pricing plans? Maybe. More likely is that a product was pushed out through a supporting network that just couldn’t handle it. Big corporations push products to market to make money––this is capitalist America, after all––and this has given rise to some amazing products throughout the history of our economy. If the supporting system isn’t powerful enough, however, the well-laid product plans can fail miserably right out of the gate––or later, as the profit model supporting that product gets more complicated.

On July 12, Netflix announced price and plan changes via a blog post, and the Internet blew up in response. Netflix has always had great customer loyalty and has listened to customers in the past, but a 60% price hike is hard to stomach. As mentioned in a CNET post, Hollywood is beginning to wake up and smell the cash as it learns how to price streaming correctly, but we end users just see fewer big titles available for streaming and a higher price to pay. Netflix abandoned its loyal customers with this change and, more important, shows signs of following a trend online where companies offer an innovative product, wait for it to go mainstream, and then bamboozle their customers once all parties involved realize how much they can make from the product. To complicate that even further, Netflix––like many other data-intensive online services––has felt the pain of network limitations in the US. Slow adoption of broadband and pathetic high-speed mobile connections make its product sluggish for the end user when, in reality, the pipes that carry the data are the issue.

Which brings the conversation to throttling and the newest entrant in the “let’s throttle your data” game show: Sprint via Virgin Wireless and its testing of data-speed throttling. Sprint joins the ranks of AT&T and Verizon in that once a threshold of data usage is breached, the clammy hand of data death clamps down on your download speed. Sprint claims that only three percent of its users are affected, but as more and more cloud services are offered, that number will increase. Data-throttling begs the question, “Why throttle anyway?” The easy answer is the almighty dollar, but the real answer lies in poor network development. The pipes just can’t handle the current load, which leads to network performance issues, which ultimately affects every service or application that requires a connection to the net.

As more and more cloud services are offered, the data caps will just become a bigger issue. The amateur smartphone owner who surfs the net and does basic emailing and social media posting may never really have an issue with data caps, but once these users start streaming video, music, and files through cloud services, they are in for a rude awakening. Mobile customers need better options, and so far, the market has only narrowed the offerings on the floor and raised the price for each.

Author: John Carew